Beyond the headline number: What India’s Rs 1.3 lakh crore MTF book really tells us


India’s margin trading facility (MTF) book has grown roughly five-fold, from around Rs 25,000 crore in FY23 to over Rs 1.3 lakh crore today. Read in isolation, that number invites comparisons to the leverage-driven volatility seen overseas. Read in context, it is better understood as evidence of deepening cash-market participation, supported by a regulatory framework built specifically to avoid the structural risks that produced Kospi-style volatility.

The surge in retail participation, reflected in 13.1 crore investors (NSE) and over 23.16 crore demat accounts, has transformed India’s equity landscape. In such an environment, the growing popularity of MTF is hardly surprising, offering investors a capital-efficient route to build equity positions.

Moreover, sustained gains in Indian equities over the past few years have enabled investors to use MTF to increase exposure to high-conviction stocks and capitalise on market opportunities.

Unlike other markets, which have been facing significant volatility, the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (Sebi) decision to put stringent conditions such as 100% upfront collection of futures margins and option premiums, along with peak-margin regulations, has largely eliminated the availability of unchecked leverage.

In addition, the increase in index derivatives contract sizes to Rs 15-20 lakh has raised capital requirements and created higher entry barriers for retail participants, thereby preventing the occurrence of any Kospi-style market volatility.

Live Events

South Korean Experience

The contrast with South Korea‘s experience is particularly instructive. The volatility surrounding Kospi-linked single-stock leveraged ETFs was not merely a consequence of leverage, but of how that leverage was structured.
A handful of stocks – an electronic giant and a semiconductor-focused company – accounted for more than half of the benchmark index, concentrating risk in a narrow segment of the market. Leveraged ETFs tied to these stocks were required to rebalance their positions daily to maintain target exposure, creating a mechanical feedback loop.During the recent market rout in South Korea, fund managers were forced to sell underlying shares near the close, amplifying downward price moves, triggering margin calls, and contributing to trading halts. The episode eventually prompted regulators to curb the launch of new leveraged products and tighten retail participation norms.

India’s MTF Ecosystem Advantages

The key differentiator between India’s MTF ecosystem and other overleveraged products seen in some overseas markets is that its built-in safeguards make it structurally less vulnerable to the feedback-loop risks that have periodically surfaced in South Korea’s and the US leveraged ETF markets.

Unlike centrally managed leveraged ETFs that require daily rebalancing and can trigger programmatic selling during market stress, MTFs in the domestic market operate through decentralised broker-client relationships, with positions monitored and liquidated individually based on margin requirements.

The resilience of India’s market structure stems not only from the nature of MTF itself but also from the extensive safeguards built into the broader trading ecosystem.

Along with the tightened speculative leverage, Sebi has also rationalised weekly options expiries with exchanges permitted to offer such contracts on only one benchmark index, reducing the intensity of speculative expiry-day activity.

Additional margin requirements, including expiry-day surcharges on short options positions and the removal of certain margin offsets, have further limited the possibility of excessive leverage accumulating ahead of contract expiry.

Equally important are the multiple layers of risk monitoring embedded within the market infrastructure. Single-stock derivatives are subject to exchange-monitored Market Wide Position Limits (MWPL), and once open interest approaches prescribed thresholds, fresh positions are restricted to prevent leverage from building to destabilising levels.

At the same time, clearing corporations continuously assess margin requirements in real time using portfolio SPAN risk models, generating immediate alerts when market movements erode collateral buffers.

Together with strict margin requirements, approved-stock eligibility norms and broker-level exposure controls, these measures help ensure that leverage remains transparent, well-collateralised and dispersed, significantly reducing the risk of a disorderly deleveraging cycle.

Ultimately, the significance of India’s expanding MTF book lies not in the amount of leverage it represents, but in the depth, diversification, and resilience of the market it increasingly supports.

(The author Amit Majumdar is Group Chief Strategy Officer, Angel One)

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)



Source link

Exit mobile version